State ex rel. Dubarry v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Dubarry v. State

925 So. 2d 493, 2006 La. LEXIS 794, 2006 WL 1027114

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 10, 2006·No. No. 2005-KH-0321·Published

Opinion

In re Dubarry, Rene S.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. J, Nos. 354148, 354149; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2004 KW 1934.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded to the district court. The district court is ordered to appoint counsel and hold a hearing at which it will determine whether the face of the pleadings shows that relator’s convictions violate double jeopardy principles. United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. 563, 109 S.Ct. 757, 102 L.Ed.2d 927 (1989); State v. Arnold, 01-1399 (La.4/12/02), 816 So.2d 289. In all other respects the application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Dubarry, Rene S.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. J, Nos. 354148, 354149; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2004 KW 1934.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded to the district court. The district court is ordered to appoint counsel and hold a hearing at which it will determine whether the face of the pleadings shows that relator’s convictions violate double jeopardy principles. United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. 563, 109 S.Ct. 757, 102 L.Ed.2d 927 (1989); State v. Arnold, 01-1399 (La.4/12/02), 816 So.2d 289. In all other respects the application is denied.

State ex rel. Dubarry v. State, 925 So. 2d 493, 2006 La. LEXIS 794, 2006 WL 1027114 (La. 2006).

Pincite

925 So. 2d 493 (State ex rel. Dubarry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related