State ex rel. Dubarry v. State

925 So. 2d 493, 2006 La. LEXIS 794, 2006 WL 1027114
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 10, 2006
DocketNo. 2005-KH-0321
StatusPublished

This text of 925 So. 2d 493 (State ex rel. Dubarry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Dubarry v. State, 925 So. 2d 493, 2006 La. LEXIS 794, 2006 WL 1027114 (La. 2006).

Opinion

In re Dubarry, Rene S.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. J, Nos. 354148, 354149; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2004 KW 1934.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded to the district court. The district court is ordered to appoint counsel and hold a hearing at which it will determine whether the face of the pleadings shows that relator’s convictions violate double jeopardy principles. United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. 563, 109 S.Ct. 757, 102 L.Ed.2d 927 (1989); State v. Arnold, 01-1399 (La.4/12/02), 816 So.2d 289. In all other respects the application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Broce
488 U.S. 563 (Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Arnold
816 So. 2d 289 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
925 So. 2d 493, 2006 La. LEXIS 794, 2006 WL 1027114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-dubarry-v-state-la-2006.