State ex rel. Dubarry v. Judges of Divisions "C" & "E" of the Civil District Court

52 La. Ann. 1255
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 15, 1900·No. No. 13,497·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nicholls, C. J.

I-see no ground for the action of the 'Supreme Court in this matter. The different Divisions of the Civil District Court are all parts of one single court, and I do not see how a mere [1256]*1256Irarsfer after allotment from one Division to another, in which the e.u cutory process issued and the sale was made, could injure the relator. I think any order given, or action taken by Division “E” in the matter would, under the circumstances of this case, be legal and subject ito no complaint as to jurisdiction. These are my views, and I therefore refuse the application, subject to action of other members of the court. (Signed) Francis T. Nicholls,

Chief Justice.

We concur. (Signed) L. B. W. J. A. B. N. C. B. F. A. M.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Dubarry v. Judges of Divisions "C" & "E" of the Civil District Court, 52 La. Ann. 1255 (La. 1900).

52 La. Ann. 1255 (State ex rel. Dubarry v. Judges of Divisions "C" & "E" of the Civil District Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robertson v. Cambon
146 So. 738 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1933)
Byrnes v. Byrnes
38 So. 991 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1905)