State ex rel. Dubarry v. Judges of Divisions "C" & "E" of the Civil District Court

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Dubarry v. Judges of Divisions "C" & "E" of the Civil District Court

52 La. Ann. 1255

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 15, 1900

DocketNo. 13,497

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 52 La. Ann. 1255 (State ex rel. Dubarry v. Judges of Divisions "C" & "E" of the Civil District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Dubarry v. Judges of Divisions "C" & "E" of the Civil District Court, 52 La. Ann. 1255 (La. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nicholls, C. J.

I-see no ground for the action of the 'Supreme Court in this matter. The different Divisions of the Civil District Court are all parts of one single court, and I do not see how a mere [1256]*1256Irarsfer after allotment from one Division to another, in which the e.u cutory process issued and the sale was made, could injure the relator. I think any order given, or action taken by Division “E” in the matter would, under the circumstances of this case, be legal and subject ito no complaint as to jurisdiction. These are my views, and I therefore refuse the application, subject to action of other members of the court. (Signed) Francis T. Nicholls,

Chief Justice.

We concur. (Signed) L. B. W. J. A. B. N. C. B. F. A. M.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nicholls, C. J.

I-see no ground for the action of the 'Supreme Court in this matter. The different Divisions of the Civil District Court are all parts of one single court, and I do not see how a mere [1256]*1256Irarsfer after allotment from one Division to another, in which the e.u cutory process issued and the sale was made, could injure the relator. I think any order given, or action taken by Division “E” in the matter would, under the circumstances of this case, be legal and subject ito no complaint as to jurisdiction. These are my views, and I therefore refuse the application, subject to action of other members of the court. (Signed) Francis T. Nicholls,

Chief Justice.

We concur. (Signed) L. B. W. J. A. B. N. C. B. F. A. M.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 La. Ann. 1255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-dubarry-v-judges-of-divisions-c-e-of-the-civil-la-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack