State ex rel. Drevers v. Drevers

781 P.2d 343, 308 Or. 462
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided October 26, 1989·No. TC D087-258; CA A48832; SC S36171·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this proceeding, the defendant was found in contempt and ordered “placed in the custody of the Yamhill County Sheriff for a period not to exceed 30 days.” The defendant appealed, claiming that the state did not prove that the defendant wilfully disobeyed a court order. The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. 95 Or App 582, 770 P2d 619 (1989).

After the trial court’s decision, but before the Court of Appeals’ decision, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Hicks v. Feiock, 485 US 624, 108 S Ct 1423, 99 L Ed 2d 721 (1988), and held that, in criminal contempt cases, the contempt must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. After the defendant filed a petition for review, the plaintiff State of Oregon joined in the request that this case be remanded to the trial court for further proceedings in light of Hicks. We therefore reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court and remand this case to the circuit court for further proceedings in light of Hicks v. Feiock, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Drevers v. Drevers, 781 P.2d 343, 308 Or. 462 (Or. 1989).

781 P.2d 343 (State ex rel. Drevers v. Drevers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State Department of Corrections
829 P.2d 710 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
State ex rel. Emery v. Andisha
805 P.2d 718 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
State ex rel. United Financial Systems, Inc. v. Holst
794 P.2d 7 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1990)
State ex rel. Frohnmayer v. U-Kamp Motorhome Co.
782 P.2d 157 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1989)