State ex rel. Drake v. Demoss
This text of 4 Ind. 189 (State ex rel. Drake v. Demoss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a case of bastardy, instituted on the complaint of Harriet L. Drake, before a justice of the peace, on the 25th day of March, 1848. Upon an examination before the justice, the defendant was adjudged to be the father of the bastard, and recognized to appear at the next term of the Circuit Court of Pulaski county, to answer the accusation.
Thé defendant appeared in the Circuit Court and moved to quash the proceeding, on the ground that the affidavit filed before the justice was defective in not sufficiently alleging the residence of the'complainant. The Court sustained the motion, and dismissed the complaint.
This was erroneous. Under the act of 1843, R. S. p. 363, s. 1, it was not necessary that the affidavit should state the complainant’s place of residence. See The State &c. v. Gray, 8 Blackf. 274.
The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Stuart, J., having been concerned as counsel, was absent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Ind. 189, 1853 Ind. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-drake-v-demoss-ind-1853.