State ex rel. Draganic v. Industrial Commission

699 N.E.2d 1284, 83 Ohio St. 3d 355
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 14, 1998·No. No. 96-90·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Subsequent to the completion of briefing in this case, we decided State ex rel. Draganic v. Indus. Comm. (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 461, 663 N.E.2d 929. There, we held that the commission was not bound by its January 10, 1992 interlocutory order and did not abuse its discretion in denying PTD subsequent to April 20, 1992. Claimant’s appeal is, therefore, moot, and it is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Draganic v. Industrial Commission, 699 N.E.2d 1284, 83 Ohio St. 3d 355 (Ohio 1998).

699 N.E.2d 1284 (State ex rel. Draganic v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Draganic v. Indus. Comm.
1998 Ohio 48 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)