State ex rel. DPR Properties, Inc. v. Butler Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. DPR Properties, Inc. v. Butler Cty. Bd. of Elections

671 N.E.2d 266, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1434, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 1797

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 30, 1996

Docket96-2220

StatusPublished

This text of 671 N.E.2d 266 (State ex rel. DPR Properties, Inc. v. Butler Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. DPR Properties, Inc. v. Butler Cty. Bd. of Elections, 671 N.E.2d 266, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1434, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 1797 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C. J., Douglas and Cook, JJ., concur because of laches. Stratton, J., concurs. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., would deny the writ. Resnick, J., would grant the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C. J., Douglas and Cook, JJ., concur because of laches. Stratton, J., concurs. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., would deny the writ. Resnick, J., would grant the writ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

671 N.E.2d 266, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1434, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 1797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-dpr-properties-inc-v-butler-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-1996.