State ex rel. Downing v. Burkhardt
This text of 101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 515 (State ex rel. Downing v. Burkhardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court finds that the defendant is in default for answer or demurrer, and has failed to show cause why the temporary writ of prohibition heretofore allowed by the court should not be made permanent.
It is therefore ordered and adjudged, by agreement of parties hereto, by the court that said temporary writ be, and the same hereby is, made permanent.
Writ allowed by agreement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-downing-v-burkhardt-ohio-1920.