State Ex Rel. Dowling v. Canal Bank & Trust Co.
This text of 37 So. 2d 709 (State Ex Rel. Dowling v. Canal Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An alternative writ of mandamus was issued herein, ordering the judge of Division “E” of the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans to grant suspensive and devolutive appeals petitioned for by relatrix on August 5th, 1948 or show cause to the contrary. Inasmuch as the judge has granted the appeals, the question presented on the rule is moot except for the claim of relatrix that the judge be condemned to pay the costs.
In the recent case of Tucker v. Edwards, 212 La. 457, 32 So.2d 845, where a similar contention was made, we said that we knew of no rule of law authorizing the taxing of costs against a trial judge in matters where remedial writs are granted to review his rulings. That decision governs this case.
*285 Accordingly, the rule issued herein is discharged. The costs incurred in this court in connection with the securing of the writ are to be taxed against the party cast after final determination of the suit on its merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 So. 2d 709, 214 La. 283, 1948 La. LEXIS 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-dowling-v-canal-bank-trust-co-la-1948.