State ex rel. Dowlin v. Rigsby

43 S.W. 1101, 91 Tex. 351, 1897 Tex. LEXIS 432
Texas Supreme Court·Decided December 23, 1897·No. Application No. 1638·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

GAINES, Chief Justice.

The Court of Civil Appeals were inclined to doubt whether this proceeding was authorized by law, and we are disposed to agree with them. Growing out of that question is another as to the jurisdiction of this court. But having examined the case upon its merits, we are clearly of opinion that it was correctly decided in the Court of Civil Appeals. In any event the application must be refused. The result being necessarily the same, we refuse the application without passing upon either of the jurisdictional questions.

Application refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Dowlin v. Rigsby, 43 S.W. 1101, 91 Tex. 351, 1897 Tex. LEXIS 432 (Tex. 1897).

43 S.W. 1101 (State ex rel. Dowlin v. Rigsby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

in Re David-Richard: Lutz
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011
Newsom v. State
922 S.W.2d 274 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Chenault v. Bexar County
747 S.W.2d 400 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
McCraw v. Vickers
717 S.W.2d 738 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Tarrant County v. Ashmore
635 S.W.2d 417 (Texas Supreme Court, 1982)
Harris County Commissioners Court v. Moore
420 U.S. 77 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Price v. County School Trustees of Navarro County
192 S.W. 1140 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1917)