State ex rel. Douglas v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Douglas v. State

728 So. 2d 879, 1998 La. LEXIS 3625, 1998 WL 959956

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 20, 1998

DocketNo. 98-KH-2492

StatusPublished

This text of 728 So. 2d 879 (State ex rel. Douglas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Douglas v. State, 728 So. 2d 879, 1998 La. LEXIS 3625, 1998 WL 959956 (La. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Douglas, Horace; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Union, 3rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 33257; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 31648-KH.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post conviction relief he filed early in the year in 1997. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

VICTORY, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Douglas, Horace; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Union, 3rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 33257; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 31648-KH.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post conviction relief he filed early in the year in 1997. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

VICTORY, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

728 So. 2d 879, 1998 La. LEXIS 3625, 1998 WL 959956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-douglas-v-state-la-1998.