State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Board of Public Instruction

123 So. 540, 98 Fla. 66
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 25, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 123 So. 540 (State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Board of Public Instruction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Douglas v. Board of Public Instruction, 123 So. 540, 98 Fla. 66 (Fla. 1929).

Opinions

STATEMENT
An alternative writ of mandamus issued by this Court alleges in effect that under Chapter 7808, Acts of 1919, as amended by Chapter 9135, Acts of 1923, Section 688, Comp. Gen. Laws 1927, on or about July 1, 1928, "the relator was duly and lawfully appointed as attendance officer of the board of public instruction for the County of Duval, State of Florida, for the period of one year, beginning July 1, 1928;" "that relator accepted said appointment and employment by said board, and thereupon entered upon the performance of his duties as such attendance officer; that on the 21st day of January, A.D. 1929, the said Board of Public Instruction, by the affirmative votes of said W. F. Bunch and J. C. Coppedge, Sr., arbitrarily, without cause, and without advising or informing the relator that he had in any way neglected or failed to perform his duties as such attendance officer, under the laws of the State of Florida as aforesaid, and without preferring any charges *Page 68 against him and without notice, summarily dismissed and discharged him from the employment or office as aforesaid, and appointed other persons to do the work for which the relator had been appointed as aforesaid; that no salaries have been paid to the said new appointees; that the relator, W. P. Douglass, at all times since his dismissal, as aforesaid, has been, and still is, ready, able and willing to perform, and has offered to perform, each and all of the duties pertaining to his said appointment and employment and office, but that the said respondents, W. F. Bunch and J. C. Coppedge, Sr., and the said Board of Public Instruction, acting by and through its said two members, as aforesaid, has declined and refused to reinstate the relator in his position or to permit him to perform the duties appertaining thereto; that relator's salary was payable semi-monthly in accordance with the regular custom of the Board of Public Instruction for the County of Duval; that since the semi-monthly payment of $162.50 which became due and was paid to the relator, W. P. Douglass, on January 15, 1929, respondent, W. F. Bunch, as Chairman of said Board, has refused to prepare or sign as Chairman of said Board, any further salary warrants in favor of the relator, W. P. Douglass, on account of salary to which he is entitled under the terms of his appointment and contract as aforesaid, and the said Board of Public Instruction, acting by and through its members, as aforesaid, have refused to recognize the relator, W. P. Douglass, as being any longer the attendance officer, or in the employ of the said Board or entitled to receive the semi-monthly payment on account of his salary as aforesaid; that respondent, W. Henry Bryant, was on or about the 21st day of January, 1929, after discharge of relator, as aforesaid, appointed and employed by said Board of Public Instruction as attendance officer for Duval County, Florida; *Page 69 that the said W. Henry Bryant, since said date has been in possession of the keys, books, records, fixtures, etc., appertaining to said office or position; that no salary has been paid to the said W. Henry Bryant as such attendance officer, although said W. F. Bunch and J. C. Coppedge, Sr., majority members of said Board, have voted to pay the same; that R. B. Rutherford, County Superintendent, has refused to sign any warrant for compensation or salary to the said W. Henry Bryant."

The command of the writ is that the County Board of Public Instruction "forthwith restore the relator, W. P. DOUGLASS, to the office, position and employment of attendance officer for the Board of Public Instruction for the County of Duval, State of Florida, and permit him to perform all the duties pertaining to said office, position and employment, and that you, W. F. Bunch, as Chairman of said Board, do forthwith prepare four warrants in favor of said W. P. Douglass, each in the sum of One Hundred Sixty-two and 50/100 ($162.50) Dollars, drawn upon a depository of said Board in the City of Jacksonville, Florida, where said Board has sufficient funds in its salary account to pay said warrants, and that upon the preparation of said warrants that you, W. F. Bunch, sign the same as Chairman of said Board, and thereupon forthwith deliver said warrants to R. B. Rutherford, Superintendent of Public Instruction of said County, and Secretary of said Board, for his counter signature, and the affixing of the seal of said Board to said warrants; that you, W. Henry Bryant, forthwith deliver to the relator, W. P. Douglass, the keys, books, records, fixtures, etc., appertaining to the office and position of attendance officer of Duval County, Florida; OR in default in performing the acts aforesaid you severally do show cause why you have not done so." The alternative writ was demurred to. *Page 70

The statute contains the following provisions:

"The county board of public instruction in each county is hereby authorized and directed to appoint one or more attendance officers, as may be necessary for the faithful execution of the provisions of this Article, and to prescribe the district or territory to be under the supervision of said attendance officer or officers, and to fix the compensation of said attendance officer or officers, for the time actually employed in the performance of duties, said compensation to be paid from the county school fund. And if deemed advisable by the county board of public instruction, any supervisor or trustee of schools within the county, or any county superintendent of public instruction who gives his consent to the said county board of public instruction to serve as an attendance officer without compensation, may be appointed as attendance officer or attendance officers. The county board of public instruction is hereby authorized to remove any attendance officer who fails to perform his duties as prescribed in this Article.

"During the month of June in each and every year, it shall be the duty of every attendance officer appointed under the provisions of this Article to take an accurate census, in triplicate, of all children between the ages of seven and eighteen years in the territory or district in which he is acting; the said census to show the name, sex, age and date of birth and distance from the nearest school, of each child, the school grade completed, and the name of the parent, guardian or other person having the custody, control or charge of such children, with the postoffice address thereof; and on or before the first day of July of each and every year, one copy thereof shall be filed in the office of the county *Page 71 superintendent of public instruction, one copy filed in the office of the State Superintendent of Public Instruction, and one copy shall be retained by the attendance officer, but no child over sixteen years of age is under compulsion to attend school.

"It shall be the duty of the attendance officer to serve a notice upon any parent, guardian or other person having the custody, control or charge of any child who has been absent from school in violation of the provisions of this Article, to cause said child to attend school as provided in this Article.

"It shall be the duty of each attendance officer appointed under the provisions of this Article to furnish the principal or teacher in charge of any school within the territory or district for which the attendance officer is appointed with a list of the names of all children in such district who should attend school.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 2008
Belcher Oil Company v. Dade County
271 So. 2d 118 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)
State Ex Rel. Landis v. Blake
148 So. 566 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Blitch v. Buchanan
131 So. 151 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
State Ex Rel. Davis v. Love
126 So. 374 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 So. 540, 98 Fla. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-douglas-v-board-of-public-instruction-fla-1929.