State ex rel. Dopkowski v. Murray

Indiana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Dopkowski v. Murray

106 N.E.2d 100, 230 Ind. 634, 1952 Ind. LEXIS 232

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 27, 1952

DocketNo. O-281

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 106 N.E.2d 100 (State ex rel. Dopkowski v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Dopkowski v. Murray, 106 N.E.2d 100, 230 Ind. 634, 1952 Ind. LEXIS 232 (Ind. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner filed his verified motion seeking an alternative writ of mandate against respondent to compel him to perform certain acts relating to matters allegedly pending in the Lake County Criminal Court.

Rule 2-35 of this court, 1949 Revision, provides that petitions for writs of mandate shall be verified and filed in triplicate and if the relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court, as does the petition herein, certified copies of all pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter must be set out in the petition, or submitted as exhibits thereto.

The petitioner herein has failed to comply with this rule and for that reason said petition is denied.

Note.—Reported in 106 N. E. 2d 100.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI