State Ex Rel. Donnelly v. Bell

Washington Supreme Court

State Ex Rel. Donnelly v. Bell

289 P. 27, 157 Wash. 696, 1930 Wash. LEXIS 930

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedJune 4, 1930

DocketNo. 22567. Department Two.

StatusPublished

This text of 289 P. 27 (State Ex Rel. Donnelly v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Donnelly v. Bell, 289 P. 27, 157 Wash. 696, 1930 Wash. LEXIS 930 (Wash. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a similar case to that of State ex rel. Miller v. Bell, ante p. 279, 289 Pac. 25.

In this case there are three counts in the information, alleging different dates and different quantities of intoxicating liquor, other than alcohol, being carried about by relators, for unlawful sale or disposition in Snohomish county, Washington.

For the reasons stated in the Miller case, supra, the alternative writ is quashed and the peremptory writ denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a similar case to that of State ex rel. Miller v. Bell, ante p. 279, 289 Pac. 25.

In this case there are three counts in the information, alleging different dates and different quantities of intoxicating liquor, other than alcohol, being carried about by relators, for unlawful sale or disposition in Snohomish county, Washington.

For the reasons stated in the Miller case, supra, the alternative writ is quashed and the peremptory writ denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

289 P. 27, 157 Wash. 696, 1930 Wash. LEXIS 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-donnelly-v-bell-wash-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack