State ex rel. Doming v. State

161 So. 3d 646, 2015 La. LEXIS 730, 2015 WL 1607939
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 27, 2015·No. No. 2014-KH-1264·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re Doming, Dennis; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 10-2138; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 14-KH-328.

[647]*647Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. Because the terms of the statute under which relator was sentenced do not include a prohibition on parole, see R.S. 14:100; R.S. 15:529.1, the district court is directed to resentence relator to a term which does not include such a prohibition. Relator’s parole eligibility is to be determined by the Department of Corrections pursuant to R.S. 15:574.4. St. Amant v. 19th J.D.C., 94-0567 (La.9/3/96), 678 So.2d 536; cf. State ex rel. Simmons v. Stalder, 93-1852 (La.1/26/96), 666 So.2d 661.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Doming v. State, 161 So. 3d 646, 2015 La. LEXIS 730, 2015 WL 1607939 (La. 2015).

161 So. 3d 646 (State ex rel. Doming v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Doming
197 So. 3d 812 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)