State ex rel. Doming v. State
This text of 161 So. 3d 646 (State ex rel. Doming v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Doming, Dennis; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. H, No. 10-2138; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 14-KH-328.
[647]*647Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. Because the terms of the statute under which relator was sentenced do not include a prohibition on parole, see R.S. 14:100; R.S. 15:529.1, the district court is directed to resentence relator to a term which does not include such a prohibition. Relator’s parole eligibility is to be determined by the Department of Corrections pursuant to R.S. 15:574.4. St. Amant v. 19th J.D.C., 94-0567 (La.9/3/96), 678 So.2d 536; cf. State ex rel. Simmons v. Stalder, 93-1852 (La.1/26/96), 666 So.2d 661.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 So. 3d 646, 2015 La. LEXIS 730, 2015 WL 1607939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-doming-v-state-la-2015.