State Ex Rel. Domhoff & Joyce Co. v. Harlan

144 N.E. 610, 109 Ohio St. 634, 109 Ohio St. (N.S.) 634, 1924 Ohio LEXIS 424
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 22, 1924·No. 18296·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Court finds that the relator has an adequate remedy at law and the alternative writ of mandamus is therefore denied and the petition dismissed.

Writ denied and petition dismissed. ■

Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Domhoff & Joyce Co. v. Harlan, 144 N.E. 610, 109 Ohio St. 634, 109 Ohio St. (N.S.) 634, 1924 Ohio LEXIS 424 (Ohio 1924).

144 N.E. 610 (State Ex Rel. Domhoff & Joyce Co. v. Harlan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. First National Bank v. Village of Botkins
48 N.E.2d 865 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1943)