State Ex Rel. Domhoff & Joyce Co. v. Harlan
144 N.E. 610, 109 Ohio St. 634, 109 Ohio St. (N.S.) 634, 1924 Ohio LEXIS 424
This text of 144 N.E. 610 (State Ex Rel. Domhoff & Joyce Co. v. Harlan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Domhoff & Joyce Co. v. Harlan, 144 N.E. 610, 109 Ohio St. 634, 109 Ohio St. (N.S.) 634, 1924 Ohio LEXIS 424 (Ohio 1924).
Opinion
The Court finds that the relator has an adequate remedy at law and the alternative writ of mandamus is therefore denied and the petition dismissed.
Writ denied and petition dismissed. ■
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State Ex Rel. First National Bank v. Village of Botkins
48 N.E.2d 865 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1943)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
144 N.E. 610, 109 Ohio St. 634, 109 Ohio St. (N.S.) 634, 1924 Ohio LEXIS 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-domhoff-joyce-co-v-harlan-ohio-1924.