State ex rel. Dixon v. Judges, Third Judicial District Court

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Dixon v. Judges, Third Judicial District Court

567 So. 2d 88, 1990 La. LEXIS 2255, 1990 WL 146673

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 5, 1990

DocketNo. 90-KH-2052

StatusPublished

This text of 567 So. 2d 88 (State ex rel. Dixon v. Judges, Third Judicial District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Dixon v. Judges, Third Judicial District Court, 567 So. 2d 88, 1990 La. LEXIS 2255, 1990 WL 146673 (La. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Dixon, Patrick James; —Plaintiffs); • applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Union, 3rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 1345.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for expungment of arrest record he claims to have filed on or about May 25, 1990. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Dixon, Patrick James; —Plaintiffs); • applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Union, 3rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 1345.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for expungment of arrest record he claims to have filed on or about May 25, 1990. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

567 So. 2d 88, 1990 La. LEXIS 2255, 1990 WL 146673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-dixon-v-judges-third-judicial-district-court-la-1990.