State ex rel. Dixon v. Judge of the Fifth District Court

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Dixon v. Judge of the Fifth District Court

26 La. Ann. 119

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 15, 1874

DocketNo. 4973

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 26 La. Ann. 119 (State ex rel. Dixon v. Judge of the Fifth District Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Dixon v. Judge of the Fifth District Court, 26 La. Ann. 119 (La. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

Morgan, J.

Belator, on the opening of the court in November, asked the judge to sign the judgment again, which he refused to do.

^ This rule >is taken upon him to show cause why he should not be ordered to do so. He has made no answer.

The judgment having been signed in vacation is, under the authority of Hernandez v. James, 25 An. 483, no judgment. Being no judgment, no appeal could be taken from it. Belator had the right to see that the judgment of which he complains should be regularly signed.

The rule is made absolute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI