State ex rel. Diesman v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Diesman v. Indus. Comm.

670 N.E.2d 1364, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1428, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2053

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 18, 1996

Docket96-1761

StatusPublished

This text of 670 N.E.2d 1364 (State ex rel. Diesman v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Diesman v. Indus. Comm., 670 N.E.2d 1364, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1428, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2053 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 95APD09-1175. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of the joint application for dismissal of the appeal of U.S. Playing Card Company,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the appeal of U.S. Playing Card Company be, and hereby is, dismissed.

[1429]*1429The appeal of Industrial Commission of Ohio and Administrator of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation remains pending.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 95APD09-1175. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of the joint application for dismissal of the appeal of U.S. Playing Card Company,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the appeal of U.S. Playing Card Company be, and hereby is, dismissed.

[1429]*1429The appeal of Industrial Commission of Ohio and Administrator of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation remains pending.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

670 N.E.2d 1364, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1428, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-diesman-v-indus-comm-ohio-1996.