State ex rel. Dickman v. Defenbacher

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Dickman v. Defenbacher

158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 104

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 18, 1952·No. No. 32812·Published

Opinion

The motion to dismiss the appeal as of right is sus[105]*105taiued on the ground that the question has become moot. See State, ex rel. Dickman, a Taxpayer, v. Defenbacher, Dir., 151 Ohio St., 391, 86 N. E. (2d), 5.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Griffith, Stewart, Phillips and Hart, JJ., concur. Grieeith, Phillips and Nichols, JJ., of the Court of Appeals of the Seventh Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Zimmerman, Middleton and Matthias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The motion to dismiss the appeal as of right is sus[105]*105taiued on the ground that the question has become moot. See State, ex rel. Dickman, a Taxpayer, v. Defenbacher, Dir., 151 Ohio St., 391, 86 N. E. (2d), 5.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Griffith, Stewart, Phillips and Hart, JJ., concur. Grieeith, Phillips and Nichols, JJ., of the Court of Appeals of the Seventh Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Zimmerman, Middleton and Matthias, JJ.

State ex rel. Dickman v. Defenbacher, 158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 104 (Ohio 1952).

Pincite

158 Ohio St. (N.S.) 104 (State ex rel. Dickman v. Defenbacher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related