State ex rel. D.H.

225 S.W.3d 607, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 8116, 2005 WL 2403433
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 29, 2005·No. No. 08-05-00199-CV·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Justice.

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.App.P. 42.1(a)(1). Appellant filed her notice of appeal on May 19, 2005, appealing the trial court’s order authorizing administration of psychoactive medication. Counsel for Appellee does not oppose the motion to dismiss. Appellant has complied with the requirements of Rule 42.1(a)(1). The Court has considered the Appellant’s motion and concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. D.H., 225 S.W.3d 607, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 8116, 2005 WL 2403433 (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

225 S.W.3d 607 (State ex rel. D.H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Dh
225 S.W.3d 607 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)