State ex rel. DeWeaver v. Faust

30 Ohio Law Rep. 61
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 1, 1965·No. 38693·Published

Opinion

Schneider, Judge.

Sections 2506.01 to 2506.04, inclusive, Revised Code, afford an adequate remedy at law by way of appeal from a final order, adjudication or decision of an administrative board, so that the writ of prohibition will not issue at the instance of a party who alleges irregularities in the proceedings of such a board and an[62]*62ticipates that such a board will deprive him of procedural and substantive rights.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. DeWeaver v. Faust, 30 Ohio Law Rep. 61 (Ohio 1965).

30 Ohio Law Rep. 61 (State ex rel. DeWeaver v. Faust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.