State ex rel. Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Rd. v. Court of Common Pleas
This text of 228 N.E.2d 313 (State ex rel. Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Rd. v. Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The instant case in prohibition is before this court on a demurrer to the petition. A ruling on the demurrer is dispositive of the action.
In State, ex rel. Mansfield Telephone Co., v. Mayer et al., Judges, 5 Ohio St. 2d 222, 223, it is said:
“The rule is firmly established that the Court of Common Pleas is a court of general jurisdiction and, as such, possesses the authority initially to determine its own jurisdiction over both the person and the subject matter in an action before it, subject to the right of appeal; and generally prohibition, an extraordinary remedy entertained with caution, will not lie to prevent an anticipated erroneous judgment.”
The demurrer to the petition is sustained and the writ is denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 N.E.2d 313, 11 Ohio St. 2d 193, 40 Ohio Op. 2d 172, 1967 Ohio LEXIS 351, 66 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-detroit-toledo-shore-line-rd-v-court-of-common-pleas-ohio-1967.