State ex rel. Department of Highways v. McTeague

244 So. 2d 263, 1970 La. App. LEXIS 5139
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Department of Highways v. McTeague. Read the opinion of the Court — 244 So. 2d 263
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 30, 1970·No. No. 8153·Published

Opinion

ELLIS, Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss the devolutive appeal taken by the Department of Highways herein. Movers claim that the Department has failed to deposit in the registry of the Court the excess amount of the judgment below, and that under the provisions of R.S. 19:13, the excess must be deposited as a condition precedent to the taking of the appeal.

The Supreme Court held, in the case of State, Department of Highways v. Holmes, 251 La. 607, 205 So.2d 416 (1967), in which the same contention was made, that the making of the deposit was not essential to the validity of the appeal. The motion is without merit.

Motion to dismiss denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Department of Highways v. McTeague, 244 So. 2d 263, 1970 La. App. LEXIS 5139 (La. Ct. App. 1970).

244 So. 2d 263 (State ex rel. Department of Highways v. McTeague) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Holmes
205 So. 2d 416 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1967)