State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Dodge

166 So. 2d 286, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1855
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 10, 1964
DocketNo. 1246
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 166 So. 2d 286 (State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Dodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Dodge, 166 So. 2d 286, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1855 (La. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

TATE, Judge.

The plaintiff Department expropriated defendant’s property under the “quick-taking” statute, LSA-R.S. 48:441-48:460. The defendant landowner contested the amount of compensation deposited, and the trial court increased the award. The plaintiff Department devolutively appeals such increase.

The defendant landowner moves to dismiss the appeal. The landowner contends that the Department unconditionally acquiesced in the judgment by depositing into court the additional amount awarded. The defendant-appellee relies upon LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2085, which pertinently provides: “An appeal cannot be taken by a party * * * who voluntarily and unconditionally acquiesced in a judgment rendered against him * *

The former Orleans Court of Appeal has previously rejected similar contentions by a defendant landowner seeking to dismiss an appeal by the Department. State through Department of Highways v. Rownd, La.App.Orl., 119 So.2d 282, certiorari denied. In this decision, the court pointed out that the “quick-taking” expropriation statute contemplated a devolu-tive appeal only, as in other expropriation-suits. Since a suspensive appeal is prohibited, LSA-R.S. 19:13, LSA-Civil Code-Article 2634, the Department was under a. statutory duty to deposit the additional amount awarded, when taking a devolutive appeal. The court concluded that therefore-the deposit of the award into court did not amount to a voluntary acquiescence in the-judgment rendered against such party, such as would bar a further appeal.

We agree with the reasoning and conclusion of the Orleans court. Accordingly,, the defendant-appellee’s motion to dismiss-the appeal is denied.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Ponder
342 So. 2d 1190 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1977)
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Holmes
205 So. 2d 416 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1967)
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Holmes
194 So. 2d 181 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 So. 2d 286, 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-department-of-highways-v-dodge-lactapp-1964.