State ex rel. DeDonno v. Mason
This text of 2011 Ohio 1445 (State ex rel. DeDonno v. Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying appellant Gregory Smith DeDonno’s request for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge Lance T. Mason, to issue a final, appealable order in a civil case instituted by DeDonno.
{¶ 2} Judge Mason acted within his discretion to dismiss the case because of DeDonno’s failure to comply with a court order. See Civ.R. 41(B)(1). The action was dismissed without prejudice, which, by rule, is not a final, appealable order. See Civ.R. 41(B)(3). “Ordinarily, a dismissal ‘other than on the merits’ does not prevent a party from refiling and, therefore, ordinarily, such a dismissal is not a final, appealable order.” Natl. City Commercial Capital Corp. v. AAAA At Your Service, Inc., 114 Ohio St.3d 82, 2007-Ohio-2942, 868 N.E.2d 663, ¶ 8. Extraordinary relief in mandamus is thus not available.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 Ohio 1445, 128 Ohio St. 3d 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-dedonno-v-mason-ohio-2011.