State ex rel. Deboue v. Whitley

592 So. 2d 1287, 1992 La. LEXIS 826, 1992 WL 31413
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 21, 1992·No. No. 92-KP-0073·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s anticipation of difficulty in obtaining payment of experts’ fees does not obviate the performance of its constitutional duty to determine whether the relator is entitled to such fees, to fix them in the proper amount, and to order payment by the appropriate officer or entity. The relator is entitled to an adequate opportunity to present his claim fairly, and may not be denied the funds necessary. See, e.g., Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985). Accordingly, the writ is granted and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further hearing, if necessary, and for an order for payment of the amount of funds, if any, to which the relator is entitled.

LEMMON, J., recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Deboue v. Whitley, 592 So. 2d 1287, 1992 La. LEXIS 826, 1992 WL 31413 (La. 1992).

592 So. 2d 1287 (State ex rel. Deboue v. Whitley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brumfield v. Cain
854 F. Supp. 2d 366 (M.D. Louisiana, 2012)
Copeland v. Smith
614 So. 2d 1245 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1993)