Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Dawson v. Roberts

State ex rel. Dawson v. Roberts

165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 341
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 6, 1956·No. No. 34751·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is a duty enjoined by law upon respondent, a ministerial officer of the court, to accept and file the petition tendered by relator.

A writ of mandamus is allowed on authority of State, ex rel. Wanamaker, Judge, v. Miller, Clerk, 164 Ohio St., 176, 128 N. E. (2d), 110.

Writ allowed.

Weygandt, C. J., Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Bell and Taet, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Dawson v. Roberts, 165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 341 (Ohio 1956).

165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 341 (State ex rel. Dawson v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.