State ex rel. Davis v. Waldron

605 So. 2d 1109, 1992 La. LEXIS 2991
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Davis v. Waldron. Read the opinion of the Court — 605 So. 2d 1109
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 9, 1992·No. No. 91-KH-1996·Published

Opinion

In re Davis, Billy; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 264-708.

Granted in part; denied in part. This case is remanded to the district court for correction of relator’s sentence of 33 years at hard labor, the mandatory minimum penalty that any court could impose on a multiple offender convicted of armed robbery and sentenced under La.R.S. 15:529.1, to reflect that the sentence will run without benefit of parole. State v. Bruins, 407 So.2d 685 (La.1981). The requirement of law that relator serve his sentence without parole eligibility represents a “ ‘wholly logical, non-vindictive reason for correcting the sentence in this case. State v. Lucas, 598 So.2d 338 (La.1992) [quoting Texas v. McCullough, 475 U.S. 134, 140, 106 S.Ct. 976, 980, 89 L.Ed.2d 104 (1986)].” In all other respects the application is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Davis v. Waldron, 605 So. 2d 1109, 1992 La. LEXIS 2991 (La. 1992).

605 So. 2d 1109 (State ex rel. Davis v. Waldron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Texas v. McCullough
475 U.S. 134 (Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Bruins
407 So. 2d 685 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1981)
State v. Lucas
598 So. 2d 338 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1992)