State ex rel. Davis v. State

904 So. 2d 696, 2005 La. LEXIS 1992, 2005 WL 1639092
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 17, 2005·No. No. 2005-KH-0616·Published

Opinion

In re Davis, Karl; — -Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. E, No. 244-290.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for purchase of Boykin transcript filed on or about December 12, 2004. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Davis v. State, 904 So. 2d 696, 2005 La. LEXIS 1992, 2005 WL 1639092 (La. 2005).

904 So. 2d 696 (State ex rel. Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.