State Ex Rel. Davis v. Industrial Commission
16 N.E.2d 212, 134 Ohio St. 130, 134 Ohio St. (N.S.) 130, 12 Ohio Op. 188, 1938 Ohio LEXIS 315
Opinion
It appearing that the judges of the court are equally *131 divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one judge not participating) and are for that reason unable to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of that fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that said judgment be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Ex Rel. Davis v. Industrial Commission, 16 N.E.2d 212, 134 Ohio St. 130, 134 Ohio St. (N.S.) 130, 12 Ohio Op. 188, 1938 Ohio LEXIS 315 (Ohio 1938).
16 N.E.2d 212 (State Ex Rel. Davis v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Becker v. Industrial Commission
28 N.E.2d 361 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1940)
Welsh v. Industrial Commission
26 N.E.2d 198 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1940)
Hoppe v. Industrial Commission
25 N.E.2d 701 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1938)