State Ex Rel. Davis v. Industrial Commission

16 N.E.2d 212, 134 Ohio St. 130, 134 Ohio St. (N.S.) 130, 12 Ohio Op. 188, 1938 Ohio LEXIS 315
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 6, 1938
Docket26914
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 16 N.E.2d 212 (State Ex Rel. Davis v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Davis v. Industrial Commission, 16 N.E.2d 212, 134 Ohio St. 130, 134 Ohio St. (N.S.) 130, 12 Ohio Op. 188, 1938 Ohio LEXIS 315 (Ohio 1938).

Opinion

It appearing that the judges of the court are equally *131 divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one judge not participating) and are for that reason unable to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of that fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that said judgment be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman and Myers, JJ., concur. Matthias, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Becker v. Industrial Commission
28 N.E.2d 361 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1940)
Welsh v. Industrial Commission
26 N.E.2d 198 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1940)
Hoppe v. Industrial Commission
25 N.E.2d 701 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 N.E.2d 212, 134 Ohio St. 130, 134 Ohio St. (N.S.) 130, 12 Ohio Op. 188, 1938 Ohio LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-davis-v-industrial-commission-ohio-1938.