State Ex Rel. Davis v. City of Safety Harbor

Supreme Court of Florida

State Ex Rel. Davis v. City of Safety Harbor

135 So. 140, 101 Fla. 644

DecidedMay 26, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 135 So. 140 (State Ex Rel. Davis v. City of Safety Harbor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Davis v. City of Safety Harbor, 135 So. 140, 101 Fla. 644 (Fla. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Whitfield, P.J.

A judgment of ouster was rendered February 22,-1930, in Quo Warranto proceedings. There was no motion for a new trial. On March 31, 1930, the respondent made a' motion to vacate the judgment of ouster. This motion was granted August 6, 1930. The judgment was vacated and set aside and time allowed for amending the amended answer and for further proceedings in the cause.

A writ of error was issued to the judgment in-the cause on September 25, 1930, which was more than six months from the date of the judgment, and therefore not authorized by the-statute. There was no motion for a new trial and the statute does not authorize a writ of error to be taken to an order vacating a judgment and allowing further proceedings in a law action. See Melbourne State Bank v. Gillette, decided at this term.

*645 Dismissed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis, Terrell and Brown, J.J., and Gray, Circuit Judge, concur. Davis, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitfield, P.J.

A judgment of ouster was rendered February 22,-1930, in Quo Warranto proceedings. There was no motion for a new trial. On March 31, 1930, the respondent made a' motion to vacate the judgment of ouster. This motion was granted August 6, 1930. The judgment was vacated and set aside and time allowed for amending the amended answer and for further proceedings in the cause.

A writ of error was issued to the judgment in-the cause on September 25, 1930, which was more than six months from the date of the judgment, and therefore not authorized by the-statute. There was no motion for a new trial and the statute does not authorize a writ of error to be taken to an order vacating a judgment and allowing further proceedings in a law action. See Melbourne State Bank v. Gillette, decided at this term.

*645 Dismissed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis, Terrell and Brown, J.J., and Gray, Circuit Judge, concur. Davis, J., disqualified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 So. 140, 101 Fla. 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-davis-v-city-of-safety-harbor-fla-1931.