State ex rel. Davidson v. Mandros

2017 Ohio 7382
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 28, 2017
DocketL-17-1207
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ohio 7382 (State ex rel. Davidson v. Mandros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Davidson v. Mandros, 2017 Ohio 7382 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Davidson v. Mandros, 2017-Ohio-7382.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY

State ex rel. Melvin Davidson Court of Appeals No. L-17-1207

Relator

v.

Judge Dean Mandros DECISION AND JUDGMENT

Respondent Decided: August 28, 2017

*****

Melvin Davidson, pro se.

MAYLE, J.

{¶ 1} This case is before the court upon a complaint for writ of procedendo, filed

on August 15, 2017, by relator, Melvin Davidson, against respondent, Judge Dean

Mandros of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas. Davidson, an inmate of the

Chillicothe Correctional Institution, claims that he filed a motion to correct a void sentence on June 6, 2016, and that Judge Mandros has failed to rule on the motion. He

asks us to order Judge Mandros to issue a ruling on the motion.

{¶ 2} With his complaint, Davidson filed an affidavit of indigency asking us to

waive the required filing fee. Under 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 7(A) and R.C. 2969.25(C),

when the party bringing the action is incarcerated and seeks to have prepayment of the

filing fees waived, he must provide a certificate from the institution at which he is

incarcerated stating the amount of funds he has on deposit available to secure costs and a

statement describing any other items of value that he owns. Davidson did not do this.

{¶ 3} Because Davidson failed to comply with 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 7(A) and R.C.

2969.25(C), we dismiss his complaint and order that he pay the costs of this action. The

clerk is directed to serve upon the parties, within three days, a copy of this decision in a

manner prescribed by Civ.R. 5(B).

{¶ 4} It is so ordered.

Writ denied.

Mark L. Pietrykowski, J. _______________________________ JUDGE James D. Jensen, P.J. _______________________________ Christine E. Mayle, J. JUDGE CONCUR. _______________________________ JUDGE

2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 Ohio 7382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-davidson-v-mandros-ohioctapp-2017.