State ex rel. Davenport v. Indus. Comm.

2000 Ohio 154, 89 Ohio St. 3d 271
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 12, 2000·No. 1999-2033·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 271.]

THE STATE EX REL. DAVENPORT, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Davenport v. Indus. Comm., 2000-Ohio-154.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-2033—Submitted May 23, 2000—Decided July 12, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-1350. __________________ Philip J. Fulton & Associates and William A. Thorman III, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Gerald H. Waterman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Theodore P. Mattis and Thomas M. Taggart, for appellee Ranco, Inc. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Davenport v. Indus. Comm., 2000 Ohio 154, 89 Ohio St. 3d 271 (Ohio 2000).

2000 Ohio 154 (State ex rel. Davenport v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Davenport v. Industrial Commission
730 N.E.2d 981 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)