Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Bilbao

State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Bilbao

846 N.E.2d 25, 109 Ohio St. 3d 81
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 3, 2006·No. No. 2005-1322·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Eastman & Smith, Ltd., Thomas A. Dixon, and Richard L. Johnson, for appellant. Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneau.lt & Schaffer Co., L.P.A., and Theodore A. Bowman, for appellee Amparo Bilbao. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Andrew J. Alatis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Bilbao, 846 N.E.2d 25, 109 Ohio St. 3d 81 (Ohio 2006).

846 N.E.2d 25 (State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Bilbao) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.