State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Bilbao

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Bilbao

846 N.E.2d 25, 109 Ohio St. 3d 81

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 3, 2006

DocketNo. 2005-1322

StatusPublished

This text of 846 N.E.2d 25 (State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Bilbao) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Bilbao, 846 N.E.2d 25, 109 Ohio St. 3d 81 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Eastman & Smith, Ltd., Thomas A. Dixon, and Richard L. Johnson, for appellant. Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneau.lt & Schaffer Co., L.P.A., and Theodore A. Bowman, for appellee Amparo Bilbao. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Andrew J. Alatis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Eastman & Smith, Ltd., Thomas A. Dixon, and Richard L. Johnson, for appellant. Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneau.lt & Schaffer Co., L.P.A., and Theodore A. Bowman, for appellee Amparo Bilbao. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Andrew J. Alatis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

846 N.E.2d 25, 109 Ohio St. 3d 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-daimlerchrysler-corp-v-bilbao-ohio-2006.