State ex rel. Daigre v. State

572 So. 2d 49, 1990 La. LEXIS 3041, 1990 WL 237352
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedDecember 10, 1990
DocketNo. 90-KH-2547
StatusPublished

This text of 572 So. 2d 49 (State ex rel. Daigre v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Daigre v. State, 572 So. 2d 49, 1990 La. LEXIS 3041, 1990 WL 237352 (La. 1990).

Opinion

In re Daigre, Preston H. Jr.; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of mandamus; supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Orleans Parish Criminal District Court, Div. “E”, No. 254-187.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for reconsideration of judgment on post conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the relator’s motion which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
572 So. 2d 49, 1990 La. LEXIS 3041, 1990 WL 237352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-daigre-v-state-la-1990.