State ex. rel. Daboval v. Police Jury

39 La. Ann. 759
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1887
DocketNo. 9872
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 39 La. Ann. 759 (State ex. rel. Daboval v. Police Jury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex. rel. Daboval v. Police Jury, 39 La. Ann. 759 (La. 1887).

Opinions

On Motion to Dismiss

The opinion, of the Court was delivered by Todd, J.

The relators, who had organized themselves into a cor[761]*761poration known as the “St. Bernard Slaughterhouse Company,” applied to the police jury for the privilege of erecting, maintaining and carrying on a slaughterhouse at a place designated in said parish. .

This application was refused, and the relators then resorted to a mandamus to compel them to grant the privilege asked, and from a judgment making the mandamus peremptory defendant appeals.

The motion to dismiss is on the grounds:

1. That the matter in controversy does not exceed $2000 in value.

2. That if it does exceed that sum, that the appeal bond is insufficient in amount.

1.

The pecuniary interest involved in the controversy does no explicitly appear from the pleadings, and in the record we find several affidavits, among them that of the president of the police jury of the parish, that the pecuniary interest of each party to the suit exceeds two thousand dollars.

These affidavits, in connection with the averments of the petition in regard to the capital stock of the corporation ($100,000), and the purposes and objects of the corporation leave no doubt on our minds that the value of the franchise sought by the relators far exceeds in value the judicial amount.

Tl.

The appeal bond was fixed in the order of the judge ; and in a suit of thiseharacter it was sufficient for a suspensive appeal.

Motion refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Wanner v. Fitzgerald
163 So. 2d 819 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
State Ex Rel. Le Blanc v. Democratic State Central Committee
86 So. 2d 192 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1956)
State ex rel. Sitges v. Bayou Terre Aux Boeufs Drainage Dist.
65 So. 2d 407 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1953)
Houeye v. St. Helena Parish School Board
35 So. 2d 739 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1948)
Ernest M. Loeb Co. v. Avoyelles Drainage Dist. No. 8
60 F. Supp. 296 (W.D. Louisiana, 1945)
Murff v. Louisiana Highway Commission
157 So. 383 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1934)
Kostmayer v. Police Jury
1 La. App. 618 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1925)
State ex rel. People's State Bank v. Police Jury
97 So. 584 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1923)
Dauenhauer v. Rossner
83 So. 647 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 La. Ann. 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-daboval-v-police-jury-la-1887.