State Ex Rel. Dabney v. Butterfield

1929 OK 73, 276 P. 473, 136 Okla. 112, 1929 Okla. LEXIS 144
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided February 12, 1929·No. 18456·Published

Opinion

SWINDALL, J.

The pleadings in this case are identical with those in the companion case of State of Oklahoma ex rel. Edwin Dabney, Attorney General, v. Ed Sheldon, No. 18455, this day decided, with the exception of the name of the defendant, Ed But-terfield.

Under the authority of No. 18455, State of Oklahoma ex rel. Edwin Dabney, Attorney General, v. Ed Sheldon, this day decided, 135 Okla. 278, 276 Pac. 468, this cause is remanded to the district court of Oklahoma county, with directions to overrule the demurrer and motion of the defendant, Ed Butterfield, as to paragraphs 1, 3, and 4, and to take such other and further action and proceedings as may be consistent with this opinion, and as to paragraphs 5 to 9, each inclusive, the judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county is hereby affirmed.

HUNT, RILEY, HEPNER, CULLISON, and ANDREWS, JJ., concur. MASON, C. J., absent. LESTER, Y. C. J., not participating. CLARK, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Dabney v. Butterfield, 1929 OK 73, 276 P. 473, 136 Okla. 112, 1929 Okla. LEXIS 144 (Okla. 1929).

1929 OK 73 (State Ex Rel. Dabney v. Butterfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Dabney v. Sheldon
1929 OK 74 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)