State Ex Rel. Dabney v. Butterfield

1929 OK 73, 276 P. 473, 136 Okla. 112, 1929 Okla. LEXIS 144
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 12, 1929
Docket18456
StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK 73 (State Ex Rel. Dabney v. Butterfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Dabney v. Butterfield, 1929 OK 73, 276 P. 473, 136 Okla. 112, 1929 Okla. LEXIS 144 (Okla. 1929).

Opinion

SWINDALL, J.

The pleadings in this case are identical with those in the companion case of State of Oklahoma ex rel. Edwin Dabney, Attorney General, v. Ed Sheldon, No. 18455, this day decided, with the exception of the name of the defendant, Ed But-terfield.

Under the authority of No. 18455, State of Oklahoma ex rel. Edwin Dabney, Attorney General, v. Ed Sheldon, this day decided, 135 Okla. 278, 276 Pac. 468, this cause is remanded to the district court of Oklahoma county, with directions to overrule the demurrer and motion of the defendant, Ed Butterfield, as to paragraphs 1, 3, and 4, and to take such other and further action and proceedings as may be consistent with this opinion, and as to paragraphs 5 to 9, each inclusive, the judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county is hereby affirmed.

HUNT, RILEY, HEPNER, CULLISON, and ANDREWS, JJ., concur. MASON, C. J., absent. LESTER, Y. C. J., not participating. CLARK, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Dabney v. Sheldon
1929 OK 74 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1929 OK 73, 276 P. 473, 136 Okla. 112, 1929 Okla. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-dabney-v-butterfield-okla-1929.