State ex rel. Curry v. Morrow

980 P.2d 178, 160 Or. App. 84, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 610
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 21, 1999·No. 98C-15866; CA A103574·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this appeal from a judgment of the circuit court dismissing appellant’s petition for a writ of mandamus, appellant alleges that defendants denied appellant credit for time served in a county jail facility to which he was entitled pursuant to ORS 137.320 and ORS 137.370(2)(a). ORS 34.105 et seq. Defendants respond that there is a more recent statement of confinement from the county in the record than that relied on by them in their motion before the trial court to dismiss appellant’s petition, i.e., a statement which the trial court did not consider. Therefore, defendants request that the matter be remanded to the trial court for reconsideration. We agree to their request.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Curry v. Morrow, 980 P.2d 178, 160 Or. App. 84, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 610 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

980 P.2d 178 (State ex rel. Curry v. Morrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 137.320
Oregon § 137.320
§ 137.370
Oregon § 137.370
§ 34.105
Oregon § 34.105