State ex rel. Cunagin Construction Corp. v. Creech

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Cunagin Construction Corp. v. Creech

254 N.E.2d 18, 20 Ohio St. 2d 128, 49 Ohio Op. 2d 447, 1969 Ohio LEXIS 316

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 17, 1969

DocketNo. 69-197

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 254 N.E.2d 18 (State ex rel. Cunagin Construction Corp. v. Creech) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Cunagin Construction Corp. v. Creech, 254 N.E.2d 18, 20 Ohio St. 2d 128, 49 Ohio Op. 2d 447, 1969 Ohio LEXIS 316 (Ohio 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The written denial of the planning commission of the validity of the application for a building permit and its refusal to act on the same constituted the final act of respondents, the lawfulness of which was subject to review by appeal pursuant to Section 2506.01 et seq., Revised Code. Relator has failed to show or explain why that remedy was inadequate or unavailable.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals in denying the writ of mandamus is, therefore, affirmed on the authority of paragraph three of the syllabus of State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm., 11 Ohio St. 2d 141.

Judgment affirmed.

Taet, C. J., Matthias, O’Neill, Schneider, Herbert, Duncan and Corrigan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI