State Ex Rel. Cummings v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
This text of 60 A.2d 179 (State Ex Rel. Cummings v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus.
Petitioner was convicted of murder in the second degree, and was sentenced to the Maryland House of Correction for ten years. He alleges that he was convicted for a crime that “layed among five drunks”, and that no one knew anything about the crime until after they became sober the next day. He alleges that the truth was not told by the witnesses at the trial, as the other four men who were present at the time of the crime *749 were against him, because the woman who was killed was their friend and they did not want him to be living with her. He also alleges that while arrangement was made for him to have a lawyer, and the lawyer did all he could, he was a colored man who did not protect his constitutional rights.
The writ of habeas corpus cannot be used as an appeal or for the purpose of reviewing the evidence given in a criminal case. Rountree v. Wright, 189 Md. 292, 55 A. 2d 847.
There is no allegation in the petition showing that he was incapable of making his defense or how the Court or counsel violated fundamental rights. Olewiler v. Brady, Warden, 185 Md. 341, 44 A. 2d 807.
Application denied, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.2d 179, 191 Md. 748, 1948 Md. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cummings-v-warden-of-maryland-penitentiary-md-1948.