State ex rel. Cummings v. 34th Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Bernard

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Cummings v. 34th Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Bernard

523 So. 2d 1347, 1988 La. LEXIS 1164, 1988 WL 46157

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 10, 1988

DocketNo. 88-KH-0972

StatusPublished

This text of 523 So. 2d 1347 (State ex rel. Cummings v. 34th Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Bernard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Cummings v. 34th Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Bernard, 523 So. 2d 1347, 1988 La. LEXIS 1164, 1988 WL 46157 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Cummings, James; applying for writ of mandamus, and supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, Nos. 28009, 28010 and 28011.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post-conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Cummings, James; applying for writ of mandamus, and supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, Nos. 28009, 28010 and 28011.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post-conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

523 So. 2d 1347, 1988 La. LEXIS 1164, 1988 WL 46157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cummings-v-34th-judicial-district-court-parish-of-st-la-1988.