State ex rel. Cuevas v. Indus. Comm.
This text of 2000 Ohio 414 (State ex rel. Cuevas v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 502.]
THE STATE EX REL. CUEVAS, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Cuevas v. Indus. Comm., 2000-Ohio-414.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-1851—Submitted April 10, 2000—Decided May 24, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 94AP-275. __________________ Philip A. Marnecheck, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Gerald H. Waterman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Frantz Ward, L.L.P., and Maris J. McNamara, for appellee Columbia Iron & Metal Company. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2000 Ohio 414, 88 Ohio St. 3d 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cuevas-v-indus-comm-ohio-2000.