State Ex Rel. Crummer Co. v. Lee

Supreme Court of Florida

State Ex Rel. Crummer Co. v. Lee

15 So. 2d 442, 153 Fla. 642, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 722

DecidedOctober 29, 1943

StatusPublished

This text of 15 So. 2d 442 (State Ex Rel. Crummer Co. v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Crummer Co. v. Lee, 15 So. 2d 442, 153 Fla. 642, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 722 (Fla. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

TERRELL, J.:

This is a companion case to State of Florida, ex rel. Watson v. The Crummer Company, Fla. 15 So. (2nd) 441, decided this date. Here the Crummer Company seeks to coerce the Florida Securities Commission by mandamus to register it as a dealer in municipal securities as required by the Florida Securities Act, Section 517.16, Florida Statutes of 1941. In its return to the alternative writ, it is alleged that respondents denied relator’s request for registration on the sole ground that it had violated the Florida Securities Act by entering into the contract with the City of Inverness, more specifically described in the companion case. The return is tested by a demurrer and a motion to strike designated paragraphs. The demurrer is sustained and the motion to strike is granted on authority of State of Florida, ex rel. Watson v. The Crummer Company, decided this date. Peremptory writ is granted.

It is so ordered.

BUFORD, C. J., BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TERRELL, J.:

This is a companion case to State of Florida, ex rel. Watson v. The Crummer Company, Fla. 15 So. (2nd) 441, decided this date. Here the Crummer Company seeks to coerce the Florida Securities Commission by mandamus to register it as a dealer in municipal securities as required by the Florida Securities Act, Section 517.16, Florida Statutes of 1941. In its return to the alternative writ, it is alleged that respondents denied relator’s request for registration on the sole ground that it had violated the Florida Securities Act by entering into the contract with the City of Inverness, more specifically described in the companion case. The return is tested by a demurrer and a motion to strike designated paragraphs. The demurrer is sustained and the motion to strike is granted on authority of State of Florida, ex rel. Watson v. The Crummer Company, decided this date. Peremptory writ is granted.

It is so ordered.

BUFORD, C. J., BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, ADAMS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 So. 2d 442, 153 Fla. 642, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-crummer-co-v-lee-fla-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack