State ex rel. Crow v. Baynes

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 231
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 13, 1964
DocketNo. 38035
StatusPublished

This text of 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 231 (State ex rel. Crow v. Baynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Crow v. Baynes, 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 231 (Ohio 1964).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is no bill of exceptions to show what was before the Court of Appeals when it granted the motion for summary judgment.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of Smith v. Diamond Milk Products, Inc., 176 Ohio St., 143.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-crow-v-baynes-ohio-1964.