State ex rel. Crow v. Baynes

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 231
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 13, 1964·No. No. 38035·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is no bill of exceptions to show what was before the Court of Appeals when it granted the motion for summary judgment.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of Smith v. Diamond Milk Products, Inc., 176 Ohio St., 143.

Judgment affirmed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Crow v. Baynes, 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 231 (Ohio 1964).

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 231 (State ex rel. Crow v. Baynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.