State ex rel. Crosby v. Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Crosby v. Smith

558 So. 2d 593, 1990 La. LEXIS 742, 1990 WL 37051

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 30, 1990

DocketNo. 90-KH-0605

StatusPublished

This text of 558 So. 2d 593 (State ex rel. Crosby v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Crosby v. Smith, 558 So. 2d 593, 1990 La. LEXIS 742, 1990 WL 37051 (La. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Crosby, Allen; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 271-972.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post-conviction relief he submitted via certified mail on February 1, 1990. If relator’s representation is correct, the dis[594]*594trict court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Crosby, Allen; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 271-972.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post-conviction relief he submitted via certified mail on February 1, 1990. If relator’s representation is correct, the dis[594]*594trict court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

558 So. 2d 593, 1990 La. LEXIS 742, 1990 WL 37051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-crosby-v-smith-la-1990.