State ex rel. Creppel v. Henderson
This text of 257 So. 2d 435 (State ex rel. Creppel v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re: Euince J. Creppel, Huey L. Creppel, Ernest J. Creppel applying for writs of habeas corpus.
Writ refused. The showing made is insufficent to warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
We have no record for review. The minutes are not before us — there has been no evidentiary hearing. Relator complains of incompetent counsel and involuntary plea of guilty. Although this is pre-Boykin— knowingly — voluntary plea was the essential, Judges ex parte recall — without hearing and confrontation — of plea will not suffice. See State ex rel. Brownfield v. Henderson, 260 La. 445, 256 So.2d 437. See also State ex rel. Burks v. Henderson, 256 La. 836, 239 So.2d 351.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 So. 2d 435, 260 La. 865, 1972 La. LEXIS 4833, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-creppel-v-henderson-la-1972.