State ex rel. Cranson v. Tuck

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Cranson v. Tuck

619 So. 2d 553, 1993 La. LEXIS 1928, 1993 WL 218924

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 15, 1993

DocketNo. 93-KH-1562

StatusPublished

This text of 619 So. 2d 553 (State ex rel. Cranson v. Tuck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Cranson v. Tuck, 619 So. 2d 553, 1993 La. LEXIS 1928, 1993 WL 218924 (La. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Cranson, Juan Reginald; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Vernon, 30th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 26,649.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about May 5, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s assertion that he has filed his motion with district court is incorrect, the [554]*554district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Cranson, Juan Reginald; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Vernon, 30th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 26,649.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about May 5, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s assertion that he has filed his motion with district court is incorrect, the [554]*554district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

MARCUS, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

619 So. 2d 553, 1993 La. LEXIS 1928, 1993 WL 218924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-cranson-v-tuck-la-1993.