State ex rel. Crandall v. Fox

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State ex rel. Crandall v. Fox

141 So. 2d 779, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3287

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 5, 1962

DocketNo. 61-671

StatusPublished

This text of 141 So. 2d 779 (State ex rel. Crandall v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Crandall v. Fox, 141 So. 2d 779, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3287 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was removed from his position on the police force of the City of Miami Beach for disciplinary reasons by the police chief. His appeal to the city personnel board was denied. Thereafter he filed a mandamus action in the circuit court seeking restoration of his position. That court granted a motion to quash the alternative writ of mandamus and dismissed the cause, and the relator appealed. We have considered the several contentions made by the appellant; that the action taken against him was contrary to the provisions of the city charter; that he was denied due process of law; that no sufficient ground for removal was established against him; and that the hearing before the personnel board was not fair and impartial; and we conclude that those contentions are not sustained by the record. No error having been made to appear, the judgment appealed from should be and hereby is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was removed from his position on the police force of the City of Miami Beach for disciplinary reasons by the police chief. His appeal to the city personnel board was denied. Thereafter he filed a mandamus action in the circuit court seeking restoration of his position. That court granted a motion to quash the alternative writ of mandamus and dismissed the cause, and the relator appealed. We have considered the several contentions made by the appellant; that the action taken against him was contrary to the provisions of the city charter; that he was denied due process of law; that no sufficient ground for removal was established against him; and that the hearing before the personnel board was not fair and impartial; and we conclude that those contentions are not sustained by the record. No error having been made to appear, the judgment appealed from should be and hereby is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 So. 2d 779, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-crandall-v-fox-fladistctapp-1962.