State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessna
This text of 675 N.E.2d 9 (State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In Mandamus. This cause came on for further consideration upon relators’ motion for an order to show cause. On December 18,1996, this court issued an alternative writ and set forth a schedule for the presentation of evidence and filing of briefs. Upon consideration of relators’ motion, filed with respondent’s agreement, for an order staying further proceedings herein for fifteen days,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, granted.
[1556]*1556IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the stay shall expire February 21,1997, and relators’ brief shall be due February 24,1997.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
675 N.E.2d 9, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1555, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-crandall-pheils-wisniewski-v-decessna-ohio-1997.