Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Craig v. Kirschman

State ex rel. Craig v. Kirschman

928 N.E.2d 735, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1459
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 23, 2010·No. 2010-0621·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. Relator’s motions to consolidate, for settlement conference, to enter new evidence and exhibits, and to amend complaint are denied. Respondent’s motion to dismiss is granted. Cause dismissed.

Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Craig v. Kirschman, 928 N.E.2d 735, 125 Ohio St. 3d 1459 (Ohio 2010).

928 N.E.2d 735 (State ex rel. Craig v. Kirschman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.